Mazda MX-30 Forum banner

MX-30 REV Where's it gone

488 Views 12 Replies 6 Participants Last post by  MX30_NL
Hi . I'm new to the forum and thanks for having me. I've ordered an MX-30 REV last month with a projected delivery date for late October. However, since its launch at the Belgium motor show in January, everything's gone really quiet...Does anyone know if its still due for the summer launch as originally planned or have there been production issues? It seems strange that to date there is no evidence this car has actually been driven as there are no road tests or reviews out there at all.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
You can still order it as a drivetrain option from the Mazda website so I’m assuming it’s still going ahead.
My (Dutch) dealer told me they give an “end of the year” delivery date indication
I am really surprised anyone in the Netherlands buys this car. The total range is about 600km of which 85 electric, with a 50 L petrol tank.
So it actually returns 10km to a liter of petrol. You also pay roadtax. There is no Advantage in buying it. I expected a small dedicated engine
running on optimal revs and torque conditions to give at least 15-20 km/L.

There are far better PHEV's for this kind of money. I like my MX-30, but the PHEV is a dud.
Surely it depends on what you want to use it for. We only do around 50km most days so our E.V. is great for that but not so good for the very occassional longer journey. I could see the range extender being ideal for us if we change in the future and then can sell our our ICE Subaru that we have for longer trips.

We have a saying in the UK 'Horses for courses'. Might not make sense in Dutch though. :)
We have a saying in the UK 'Horses for courses'. Might not make sense in Dutch though. :)
Thanks for the proverb, I love these ! And you're right, we don't have an equivalent I can think of right now.

In The Netherlands its particularly sour as with a PHEV you pay roadtax like its a ICE. Based on the weight of the car, so in that aspect a battery is a handicap...

There is a temporary reduction if the output is lower than 48gr CO2/km, but that ends in 2024. Like the roadtax exemption for BEV.

My Range Rover P400e Autobiography returns 10.5 L/100km and I drive very fast mostly. Hence 1:10 for the MX-30 PHEV is rediculously high.

And exactly why you bought the MX30 REV, I bought the FF RR. I drive in the area as a BEV, long hauls its a combination.

But since the FFRR not always 'wants' to work as a BEV and randomly starts the engine, I bought a MX 30 to replace a BMW 216i active tourer,

which we had as a shopping trolley. The PHEV version of that car gives 6.5 L /100km once the battery runs out. Another proof of the extreme

consumption of the REV..
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I think it looks to be a great solution with a higher than average (ev range) and when using the generator. The mpg figures stack well against any other phevs when they're ICE is dragging around a dormant battery and electric ancillaries. But. Why has it gone so quiet on this vehicle? That's what puzzles me. I know of no documentary evidence of it ever being driven and no delivery date for my order
@jamie M The mpg/kmpL is terrible for the REV. It is worse then my full size Range Rover Hybrid, that weighs 2550 Kg. If I drive that (averaging 130kmph on the highway in France),
it returns 9,5 km/l. The REV gives WLTP 10 L / 100km.. My RR P400e gives WLTP-cycle 11.2 L/100km.. The REV should give around 5 L /100 km or better, given the
setup with an almost idling small engine driving a generator without ancillaries.
This discussion is getting off the point now. The original query was "what's happened to the REV, why has no one driven it? And when is the release?".
@jamie M I think Mazda realised its not going to sell with this level of fuel consumption and they'll wriggle out..
Why is everyone so hung up on the fuel consumption? Its 37.9 mpg combined. Pretty average but far better than a Leon Hybrid I had for a while which got around 28mpg when the battery was defunct. Please. I'm just after facts, not speculation and hearsay...."I think Mazda realised its not going to sell with this level of fuel consumption and they'll wriggle out.. ":rolleyes: Really? do you sincerely believe in that last statement? Its a tiny, very light rotary engine with direct fuel injection under very little stress, operating at a near constant RPM driving a flywheel and then,only doing so when it is operating and the battery requires rejuvination. Car manufactures don't 'wriggle'. A conglomerate such as Mazda will have spent hundreds of hours developing and testing this.
Its a tiny, very light rotary engine with direct fuel injection under very little stress, operating at a near constant RPM driving a flywheel and then,only doing so when it is operating and the battery requires rejuvination.
..and this setup with a normal 4-stroke engine could give a 2 x times better efficiency. I think Mazda is skating on thin ICE and they can not afford a dud ( ..again..).

Mazda is loosing market share in China, their major market fast. Also in the US.

1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top